Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on In what script did Moses write the Torah (Pentateuch)?

Post

In what script did Moses write the Torah (Pentateuch)?

+2
−0

I have read elsewhere (e.g. here and here) that the Torah (Pentateuch) may have been written in the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet (also called Ketav Ivri) and therefore the Ten Commandments as well. It is also cited that this is why the Samaritan Torah is written in a very similar script.

From what I see most think this is so and for example, in the well-known movie The Ten Commandments (1956) the tablets of stone appear written in the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. It is also thought that the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet descends from the Phoenician alphabet (although the former appears about 50 years later), with which I do not agree but I do not want to discuss this.

The incongruity that I find is that Paleo-Hebrew appears around 1000 BC while the date of the Exodus is calculated between 1446-1225 BC, which means that Moses did not use that script. The alphabets that are precursors of the Paleo-Hebrew/Phoenician are the Proto-Canaanite (1700-950 BC) and the Proto-Sinaitic (1850-1550 BC), which were very similar to each other, being the Proto-Canaanite alphabet, for the time in which it appears, as the main candidate. Below a comparative chart:

Image_alt_text

Then, is it possible that this was the alphabet used by Moses?, although there are no archaeological records that indicate that this alphabet was used by the Hebrews (apart from the controversial curse tablet from Mount Ebal, which I think may be authentic but at the moment not 100%) the fact that such alphabets were used by Semitic nations may indicate that perhaps the Hebrews also knew it.

So another question is, if the Torah was written in Proto-Canaanite/Proto-Sinaitic, was it written on stone (like many Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions, but which I find difficult), papyrus or parchment (although at the moment there are no known inscriptions with this writing on such material)?

Finally, I want to say that I doubt very much that the Torah was written in square Hebrew, as many people think, because it is known that there is no record of the existence of square Hebrew until long after the Exodus.

Update:

There are some researchers who have proposed that the Proto-Sinaitic alphabet was in fact used by the Hebrews and offer good evidence, some of them are:

  • Douglas Petrovich (Christian), in his book The World's Oldest Alphabet. I personally have not been able to read the whole book but I have seen articles that talk about it.

  • Michael S. Bar-Ron (Jewish), in a series of publications including The Exodus Inscriptions at Serabit el-Khadim, where he proposes that some of the inscriptions at this site were written by Moses himself.

  • Jeff A. Benner (Christian), in several of his books and his website, he even proposes that the meaning of the Hebrew words come from the pictographic meaning of the letters, some examples here.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Sidebar on Paleo-Hebrew script and Isaiah 11:15 (2 comments)
Sidebar on Paleo-Hebrew script and Isaiah 11:15
qohelet‭ wrote 1 day ago

This is definitely possible, but also likely these books evolved over time through hands of many redactors, so only certain sections were perhaps written this way. A really cool example of this is in Isaiah 11:15 (BHS):

וְהֵנִ֥יף יָד֛וֹ עַל־הַנָּהָ֖ר בַּעְיָ֣ם רוּח֑וֹ

Translation: "And he will brandish his hand over the river ______ his wind". The challenge is the word בַּעְיָם, formed from the combination of the preposition בְּ and the noun עֲיָם. Most translations read this as some variation of “with the scorching of.” The challenge with this reading is that עֲיָם has no other occurrences in the Old Testament, and the word can be only questionably connected to heat via the Arabic ġāma (“to be overcast or tormented by a burning thirst”). Some scholars accept a reading not as בַּעְיָם but as בִּעֹצָם, changing the yod (י) to a ṣade (צ).

qohelet‭ wrote 1 day ago

This textual difference makes sense in light of the Paleo-Hebrew script, because common letter confusions in the Paleo-Hebrew script also include aleph and taw, yod and ṣade, and peh and nun. It would then be translated as “and he will brandish his hand over the river with the might of his wind,” treating this as a yod/ṣade confusion in the Paleo-Hebrew script.

See William Fullilove, Introduction to Hebrew: A Guide for Learning and Using Biblical Hebrew (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2017), 26–27.