Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on The idea of two reformations instead just one reformation

Parent

The idea of two reformations instead just one reformation

+1
−2

Were there historians of Christianity that claimed a similar claim to that there were actually two reformations instead just one?

I understand that both social movements operated in pretty much the same eras in Europe (excluding other similar possible movements before them) so both of them could be grasped as reform makers.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (4 comments)
Post
+0
−1

The Other Reformation

On the other hand, on the Catholic side, the Church, at the time of Luther's exit, had already been undergoing a good 1500 years worth of fairly constant reform.

The first act of "reformation" seems to have been when St. Paul rebuked St. Peter over his change of habit to no longer break bread with Gentiles. Many other acts of "reformation" have taken place since. Some examples of individual reformers include St. Francis (13th century), who effected a reform by modelling Jesus's life in prioritizing the poor, the afflicted, the dispossessed and ignored. The very people the church structure was ignoring. St. Catherine of Sienna ended the Avignon papacy. It took some further bickering and the Ecumenical Council of Constance to resolve the issue once and for all. St. Charles Borromeo dealt with a rather scandalous church in Milan in the 1500s.

Corporate reform within the Church has also been an ongoing project through the means of the Ecumenical Councils. These councils have been responsible for clarifying (but never innovating) a number of Christian doctrines such as the Trinity, the nature of Christ and the like.

And reform continues, even up to the present day with Orthodox and Catholics working on ways to heal the East-West split; Catholics and Anglicans working towards reunification (very slowly!), from the Oxford Movement up to the establishment of the Ordinariate; the clerical sex abuse scandal and its sequellae; social reforms such as combating socialism, defending human life and even ways of battling climate change.

I think the take-away here is that, at least in the Catholic understanding, there is only one work of "reformation" and it is constant, be it on the individual level or on the broader level of matters of church governance and theological understanding. This is because the Church has always understood itself to be a divine organization with a bunch of fallible humans at the controls. Contrary to the idea of "proto-protestantism", Catholic reform is always done within the context of the apostolic faith and in the embrace of the Church founded by Jesus and not as a matter of irreconcilable revolt or dissent that leads to schism and separation and its sequellae, the ultimate devolution & abandonment of doctrine that follows. The precise opposite of what reformers are supposed to strive for!

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

"Reformation" vs. "reformation" (1 comment)
"Reformation" vs. "reformation"
gmcgath‭ wrote over 2 years ago

As a historical term, "the Reformation" refers to the Protestant churches' rise following criticism of current practices in the Catholic Church. The 16th century also saw the Counter-Reformation, aka the Catholic Reformation, with the Council of Trent as a key event. It was a reaction to internal criticism as well as the breakaway churches.

Any organization which is around for hundreds of years will have periods of falling away and periods of lower-case reformation, but that's not what we're talking about here.