Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Ideas for what could be included in a Resources category

+3
−1

I feel like a "resources" category similar to what the Languages site has could be of use. One way would be to provide resources for people interested in providing answers, such as:

  • Popular systematic theologies by tradition
  • Popular exegetical works by tradition
  • Popular church history works by tradition/epoch/level of detail
  • Notable treatments of different theological subjects, grouped as needed. So, for example, "resources on the incarnation by tradition" or "resources on the Nicene Creed"

All of these could be identified as "free online" vs. "have to buy it".

Another type of resources might focus on helping people figure out which theological tradition they are most interested in.

  • List of popular preachers/theologians/commentators by tradition and/or theological system
  • Selection of diagnostic questions associated with beliefs that help identify different theological traditions
    • Maybe a flow chart, or maybe just questions related to the trinity, baptism, free will, tongues, church governance structure, etc., that are roughly tied to traditions

This is little more than brainstorming at this point, so I'm not tied to these examples. But at this point I'm inclined to think that a Resources category would be helpful.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)

1 answer

+3
−1

I would love to see a Resources category (in fact, the possibility of doing this was one of my attractions to the Codidact platform). I think these can be wiki-style posts edited (and maintained / routinely reviewed) by the community that serve as helpful guides to those looking to learn more about various things (especially when questions would be far too broad for the Q&A section since the OP needs to read several books/articles and/or learn languages and/or certain linguistic theory to get and understand an answer).

The trick is to avoid superlatives ("best," "better than," "most [adjective]", etc. which tend to be highly subjective and vary based on one's tradition. Creating organization is a good solution for this (e.g., grouping commentaries by tradition, where applicable).

We also don't necessarily want to be the source of knowledge for all resources on Christianity (since this would be an exhaustive, never-ending task), but can certainly create helpful guides for people to learn more who aren't sure where to start.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »