Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Christian views of Nicholas de Lyra's Biblical commentary

+2
−1

Hello.

Yesterday I came upon a Hebrew translation of Nicholas de Lyra's commentary on Ruth. I found it to be intriguing for a number of reasons. One reason was that he based much of his commentary on that of the famous Jewish commentator, Rashi, although he doesn't always state that he's basing off of Rashi. Usually he either writes as if he thought of the idea himself or that "the Jews say (so and so)". But a few times he does refer to "Rabbi Solomon" (Rashi) by name and he seemed to be quite respectful, especially for a man of his status, occupation, religion and era.

I was wondering whether there were other Christian scholars/clergymen, in particular ones who were contemporaries of his, who were familiar with his Jewish-based commentary and wrote about it. What did they think about? Did they view it positively or negatively?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »