Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A Does the Catholic Church teach that use of artificial contraception within marriage is a worse sin that fornication?

Recently I stumbled across an article by Catholic writer Matthew Walther, entitled The Conservative Case for Teen Pregnancy. With a title like that from a Catholic, I was expecting to see an argum...

1 answer  ·  posted 3y ago by Nathaniel‭  ·  last activity 3y ago by elemtilas‭

#2: Post edited by user avatar Nathaniel‭ · 2021-05-08T16:42:45Z (almost 3 years ago)
sp
  • Recently I stumbled across an article by Catholic writer Matthew Walther, entitled [The Conservative Case for Teen Pregnancy](https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/teenage-pregnancy-vs-the-success-sequence/). With a title like that from a Catholic, I was expecting to see an argument for early marriage, followed quickly by children, but instead Walther critiques what he calls the "success sequence," the American cultural norm that women should graduate, get a job, and get married before having children.
  • Importantly, he argues that the success sequence in the US is "possible only because of artificial contraception" and then writes:
  • > I say without hesitation that pregnancy outside wedlock is superior to the success sequence. While fornication is indeed a grave sin against chastity, it is not disordered. It is a natural act, albeit one taking place outside its proper context.
  • I read this as simply an opinion, not the teaching of Catholicism, but nonetheless based in large part on Catholic doctrine associated with fornication and contraception. Thus my question here is to get at the actual Catholic teaching underlying the argument: **Does the Catholic Church teach that use of artificial contraception within marriage is a more severe/grave sin that fornication?**
  • Recently I stumbled across an article by Catholic writer Matthew Walther, entitled [The Conservative Case for Teen Pregnancy](https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/teenage-pregnancy-vs-the-success-sequence/). With a title like that from a Catholic, I was expecting to see an argument for early marriage, followed quickly by children, but instead Walther critiques what he calls the "success sequence," the American cultural norm that women should graduate, get a job, and get married before having children.
  • Importantly, he argues that the success sequence in the US is "possible only because of artificial contraception" and then writes:
  • > I say without hesitation that pregnancy outside wedlock is superior to the success sequence. While fornication is indeed a grave sin against chastity, it is not disordered. It is a natural act, albeit one taking place outside its proper context.
  • I read this as simply an opinion, not the teaching of Catholicism, but nonetheless based in large part on Catholic doctrine associated with fornication and contraception. Thus my question here is to get at the actual Catholic teaching underlying the argument: **Does the Catholic Church teach that use of artificial contraception within marriage is a more severe/grave sin than fornication?**
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Nathaniel‭ · 2021-05-07T16:00:42Z (almost 3 years ago)
Does the Catholic Church teach that use of artificial contraception within marriage is a worse sin that fornication?
Recently I stumbled across an article by Catholic writer Matthew Walther, entitled [The Conservative Case for Teen Pregnancy](https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/teenage-pregnancy-vs-the-success-sequence/).  With a title like that from a Catholic, I was expecting to see an argument for early marriage, followed quickly by children, but instead Walther critiques what he calls the "success sequence," the American cultural norm that women should graduate, get a job, and get married before having children.  

Importantly, he argues that the success sequence in the US is "possible only because of artificial contraception" and then writes:

> I say without hesitation that pregnancy outside wedlock is superior to the success sequence. While fornication is indeed a grave sin against chastity, it is not disordered. It is a natural act, albeit one taking place outside its proper context.

I read this as simply an opinion, not the teaching of Catholicism, but nonetheless based in large part on Catholic doctrine associated with fornication and contraception.  Thus my question here is to get at the actual Catholic teaching underlying the argument: **Does the Catholic Church teach that use of artificial contraception within marriage is a more severe/grave sin that fornication?**