Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Proposing to turn off reactions on Christianity!

+3
−0

Reacting to answers is a pretty good feature I've to admit but the current reactions aren't a good fit here.

Apparently, each community is free to do its own customizations [1], therefore, I'm proposing to turn off reactions here.

The current reactions which are "Worked for me", "Outdated" and "Dangerous" has no relation to the site specifically their current descriptions indicate this.

You have tried the proposed solution and it has been effective.

The proposed solution is outdated, deprecated or no longer good practice.

The proposed solution is dangerous or harmful.

People don't post solutions, but they post answers, and really answers can't get out of date and definitely can't be dangerous. [2]

So I'm proposing to turn reactions off. We might make use of it rather than turning them off by changing the current ones to something that fits the site, but this hasn't had much traffic recently, we might turn it off until the community decides how to use reactions best. [3]


  1. Moderators can turn it off too besides admins, so that's helpful. ↩︎

  2. I feel like those descriptions fit a site like Software Development. ↩︎

  3. By either, turning them off or editing the current ones. ↩︎

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+2
−0

This makes sense to me, and seeing no objections, I've gone ahead and turned them off. These -- or different ones! -- can be enabled if the community wants.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »